There seems to be an emerging case that some challenges of engaging with young people are universal, across all types of engagement, from one-to-one working up to national policy. As unlikely as this seems our tentative analysis of our first activity exploring public sector engagement with young people seems to be pointing in this direction.
Leapfrog is running 5 major projects throughout its 3 year duration. The first of these, led by Lancaster University is looking at the challenges of engaging with young people. We are loosely defining young people as teenagers and younger with the partners we are collaborating with having their own focus within this age range. The first event for this 8 month project gathered together a select but wide spectrum of our public sector partners from national government policy level who commission a great deal of engagement activity to youth workers at the engagement ‘coal face’ day to day.
Our partners see working productively with young people as critically important and very rewarding, highlighting some excellent and creative engagement. However universal challenges persist around communication and translation between government systems and young people when it comes to delivering real and relevant outcomes to the beneficiaries involved. We talk more about this below. It was this strategic need that motivated us to make this the focus of our first major project.
One of the surprising things to emerge from the facilitated meeting was the central importance communication played in the challenges facing all of our partners. This was definitely not the case of public sector workers looking for ways to ‘consult at’ young people. Rather there was a strong feeling from Policy, to Services (like libraries, health or green space) to youth workers that the issue was bidirectional translation between the needs communicated by young people and the response from the public sector.
In particular there was an issue of translation between these groups. How can information (stories, data, drawings, plans or young people’s proposals) could be communicated in a way that had value for the recipients? All partners raised the challenge of translating this engagement into a form that could contribute to an evidenced based approach adopted by the public sector. For example, how could stories be seen as contributing to policy decisions in a rigorous defendable way? Similarly how can plans and proposals that sometimes might take many years to come into fruition be communicated in a manner meaningful to young people and how could their (vital) contribution be recognised and communicated when they had unrealistic expectations for how quickly there would be tangible change?
These and other issues will form the heart of our major project in this area. Our aim is to work directly with a small number of partners but for this to be a test-bed to create a range of resources that will help all our partners and a wide range of others who work with young people to do so in a more mutually productive manner.